What are the requisites for filing a petition under order 39 rule 2a? . in this particular case, plaintiff has violated the injunction & status quo order during the pendency of injunction order. The plaintiff has broken the lock & latch of defendant’s bedroom and has forcibly taken possession of the same during the absence of defendant Is human witness essential during final hearing ? Is CCTV camera footage not sufficient to prove the case. Pl send your legal advice at the earliest.

Question

What are the requisites for filing a petition under order 39 rule 2a? . in this particular case, plaintiff has violated the injunction & status quo order during the pendency of injunction order. The plaintiff has broken the lock & latch of defendant’s bedroom and has forcibly taken possession of the same during the absence of defendant
Is human witness essential during final hearing ? Is CCTV camera footage not sufficient to prove the case. Pl send your legal advice at the earliest.What are the requisites for filing a petition under order 39 rule 2a? . in this particular case, plaintiff has violated the injunction & status quo order during the pendency of injunction order. The plaintiff has broken the lock & latch of defendant’s bedroom and has forcibly taken possession of the same during the absence of defendant
Is human witness essential during final hearing ? Is CCTV camera footage not sufficient to prove the case. Pl send your legal advice at the earliest.What are the requisites for filing a petition under order 39 rule 2a? . in this particular case, plaintiff has violated the injunction & status quo order during the pendency of injunction order. The plaintiff has broken the lock & latch of defendant’s bedroom and has forcibly taken possession of the same during the absence of defendant
Is human witness essential during final hearing ? Is CCTV camera footage not sufficient to prove the case. Pl send your legal advice at the earliest.

Answer ( 1 )

    0
    2023-07-25T14:39:58+05:30

    The situation described by you is sufficient to file a case under Order 39 Rule 2a. Further, the CCTV footage if produced with the required certificate showing no tampering with the device would be admissible in evidence provided the owner of the camera is also examined in evidence. You are advised to file an application immediately to cease further action and restoration of your possession pending the petition.

Leave an answer

Sorry, you do not have permission to answer to this question .